Why a Freenom Domain Service May Not Work with AWS

Many web and cloud administrators are familiar with the need to coordinate their domain management across various services, such as Freenom and AWS, to ensure seamless integration and optimal performance. Specifically, when setting up a domain with Freenom, it is crucial to understand that certain configurations might lead to compatibility issues with AWS services like CloudFront, Public Load Balancers, and public hostnames. This article aims to demystify these complexities and provide clear guidance on how to avoid potential DNS record conflicts.

Understanding CNAME Records in Freenom

CNAME (Canonical Name) records are a type of DNS (Domain Name System) record that maps a domain name to another domain name. For example, if you have a domain like and want to point it to another service like , you would use a CNAME record to map to

In the context of AWS services such as CloudFront or Public Load Balancers, your Freenom DNS service must utilize CNAME records to direct traffic correctly. This is essential because these AWS services are designed to handle and distribute traffic based on these records, ensuring fast and secure access to your web applications or services.

Integrating Freenom with AWS DNS Hosting via Route 53

Although using CNAME records in Freenom is necessary for AWS public-accessible configurations, you can further enhance your setup by integrating Freenom with AWS Route 53 for DNS hosting. This integration allows you to leverage AWS’s comprehensive suite of services, including the use of a free, “lifetime” SSL certificate through AWS’s Certificate Manager (ACM).

By using AWS Route 53, you can simplify your DNS management by trusting the DNS resolution to AWS, which ensures optimal performance and reliability. Additionally, routing traffic through Route 53 means that you can employ advanced DNS features such as health checks, geolocation routing, and failover strategies, further enhancing the robustness of your domain service.

Avoiding DNS Record Conflicts

One of the key challenges in managing DNS services across different providers is the potential for conflicts, especially when a domain is managed by multiple DNS servers. AWS and Freenom both operate their own DNS resolvers, and attempting to use Freenom as an authoritative DNS server alongside another DNS service can lead to conflicts.

For instance, if you have another DNS service (say, a third-party registry) already configured to handle your domain, adding Freenom as an additional DNS server can cause issues. This is because each DNS service provides its own TTL (time to live) settings, and both providers have their own second-level DNS resolvers, leading to inconsistencies in the DNS records and potential issues with service delivery.

Conclusion and Best Practices

In summary, while Freenom and AWS offer powerful solutions for domain management and hosting, it is essential to understand how to configure these services to avoid compatibility issues. Utilizing CNAME records in Freenom for public-accessible AWS configurations and integrating with AWS Route 53 for comprehensive DNS hosting can provide seamless integration and enhanced reliability.

To avoid DNS record conflicts and ensure a smooth experience, follow these best practices:

Choose a primary DNS provider: Decide whether you will manage your domain exclusively with Freenom or Route 53 to avoid conflicts. Utilize CNAME records: Use CNAME records for any AWS public services to ensure proper traffic routing. Follow AWS guidelines: Adhere to AWS best practices for DNS configuration and utilize their advanced features for enhanced service. Monitor DNS performance: Regularly check DNS records and settings to ensure they remain consistent and function correctly.

By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your domain services are seamlessly integrated and operate efficiently within the AWS ecosystem, taking full advantage of the benefits provided by both Freenom and AWS.