Why Trump Got Credit for Operation Warp Speed: A Misunderstanding Between Business Acumen and Public Relations

In the race to develop a vaccine for the global pandemic, the credit often goes to President Trump for launching Operation Warp Speed (OWS). However, the truth behind the operation's development and its initial announcement is far from clear. This article explores the assertion that Trump took credit for Fauci's efforts, delves into the business and PR aspects that led to this misattribution, and questions why OWS funding was not extended to Pfizer.

The True Credit Gallops to Dr. Anthony Fauci

It is important to clarify that it was Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who is primarily responsible for the strategic vision behind the fast-track vaccine development. Fauci spearheaded the research and oversight of the vaccines, while President Trump lent his political muscle to expedite the process. Yet, the media and the public often attribute the initiative to Trump, thanks to his knack for public relations and branding.

Behind-the-Scenes: The Pfizer Question

Notably, Pfizer, a major player in the vaccine development race, did not directly receive “warp speed” funding. This raises the question: why did President Trump take credit for the Pfizer vaccines development when the company did not benefit from the same special funding channel as other vaccine developers? The answer lies in the strategic branding and political maneuvering, not in the direct involvement of Trump in the vaccine research.

Why Trump Focused on Delivering a Vaccine Rhythmically

Truman understood that the American people generally do not appreciate orders to give up their liberty, no matter how necessary. Instead, he chose a competitive approach, focusing on solving the problem of delivering a vaccine as quickly as possible. This strategy aligns with his business acumen, which seems to rely more on public relations than actual scientific management. President Trump viewed Operation Warp Speed as a defense operation and a key part of the United States' response to the pandemic, which he described in these terms:

"To deliver a vaccine in record-breaking time."

By framing the initiative this way, Trump effectively turned the race into a competitive political event, rather than a scientific endeavor.

Branding Strategy vs. Business Acumen

While Trump's branding skills are undeniable, his business acumen is often questionable. His approach to management, whether in real estate or government, has always been about achieving quick wins and grand gestures, rather than sustainable and profitable strategies. This dichotomy is evident in his numerous business failures, which were often due to inferior quality or an unreasonable expectation of perfection. In the context of OWS, this meant a heavy investment with a lower return, as the primary goal was to win rather than to serve the public interest effectively.

The Missed Opportunity for Economic Growth

Another aspect that deserves attention is Trump's economic policy under OWS. Instead of using OWS to directly support the economy by distributing the stimulus funds more effectively, the government focused on tax cuts and direct payments to citizens. This approach, while populist, did not significantly boost economic growth in the long term. A more strategic distribution of funds, especially to the poor, could have driven up spending and economic activity. This would have provided a bigger shot in the arm for businesses and the overall economy.

Historically, the trickle-down economic theory has been widely criticized, with historical examples showing that higher tax rates on the wealthy do not hinder economic growth. In fact, these high tax rates often correlate with greater wealth inequality and slower income growth for the middle and lower classes. A more pro-active and focused financial support strategy, such as the one proposed here, could have led to a more sustainable and equitable economic recovery.

Operation Warp Speed was a significant achievement in vaccine development, but the misattribution of its success to the presidency is a testament to the uniquely strong public relations and branding skills of President Trump. While his efforts were commendable, a more measured and strategically sound approach might have yielded better results and a fairer recognition of the contributions and efforts of experts like Dr. Fauci.