Is Jared Kushner Qualified to Be a Senior Advisor to the POTUS?
The appointment of Jared Kushner as a Senior Advisor to President Trump has been highly controversial and questioned by many regarding his qualifications and suitability for the role. Let's delve into the qualifications and factors that have raised concerns about his suitability.
Background and Experience
Quantitatively, Jared Kushner lacks significant experience in government and diplomacy, having primarily worked in finance on Wall Street. His hedge fund business experienced major financial difficulties and ultimately "crashed and burned." These setbacks might be seen as red flags for someone critical to advising the President.
While his position as a Senior Advisor during the campaign might indicate some trust and support from Trump, it is also noted that his role was not formally vetted or approved in the traditional sense. This point has many wondering about the process and standards for appointing such advisors.
Controversial Qualifications
Several factors have raised eyebrows regarding his qualifications. Firstly, Kushner's nepotistic appointment has been a significant issue. Given his position as the son-in-law of the President and husband to Ivanka Trump, there are legitimate questions about potential conflicts of interest and the need for a more rigorous approval process similar to that for cabinet members.
Moreover, his reputation for bitterness and vindictiveness has been a point of concern, suggesting that someone with such traits might not be the best choice for a high-ranking advisory position. Trump strongly endorsed Kushner's suitability during the campaign, but these personal traits could impact his effectiveness in a role that requires strategic thinking and diplomatic skills.
Dependence on Influence
Another significant concern is Isreal's influence over Kushner. Rumors persist that Israel plays a significant role in guiding his actions and decisions. This raises questions about the integrity and independence of a U.S. advisor. The idea that "Jews run everything" has historical roots and, in the context of modern politics, highlights the need for transparency and ethical considerations.
Furthermore, the argument that non-qualification has become the norm in U.S. politics is compelling. The appointment of unqualified individuals, whether due to nepotism or other reasons, has been a consistent pattern. From Hillary Clinton to George W. Bush, the political landscape often favors those with connections rather than qualifications. This cultural phenomenon suggests that the criteria for political appointments may not be based on merit alone.
Anglo Political Culture and Qualification
The appointment of Jared Kushner reflects a broader Anglo political culture that prioritizes connections and privileged amateurs. From the Renaissance period to modern-day politics, the tradition of appointing "young sons of Duke So-and-So" to manage the government continues. This cultural norm is deeply ingrained and often perpetuates a cycle of unqualified appointments.
The U.S. political system often overlooks formal qualifications in favor of personal connections and loyalty. This is exemplified by the lack of discussion around the substantial experience required for positions such as the Housing Secretary or the Secretary of State. Instead, the focus is often on how these individuals are related to the President or part of their inner circle rather than their actual competence.
Conclusion
The appointment of Jared Kushner as a Senior Advisor to the President of the United States raises many questions about the qualifications and suitability of such individuals. While his role may have been endorsed by the President, it is important to critically evaluate the criteria and processes involved in such appointments. Given the lack of formal qualifications and the controversial nature of his appointment, this issue is sure to continue being a subject of public and political debate.